Agriculture and the Ripple Effects of City & County of San Francisco v. EPA
/The Supreme Court’s decision in San Francisco v. EPA may have surprising impacts on agricultural operators and NPDES permit holders.
Read MoreNews and Information about Janzen Schroeder Ag Law
The Supreme Court’s decision in San Francisco v. EPA may have surprising impacts on agricultural operators and NPDES permit holders.
Read MoreWetlands are in the news again this summer after a company challenged whether the USDA could withhold federal benefits under Swampbuster.
Read MoreOn April 11, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit struck down an EPA rule exempting concentrated animal feeding operations from CERCLA reporting requirements for air emissions from animal wastes.
Read MoreOn February 27, 2017, the Indiana Office of Environmental Adjudication upheld the Indiana Department of Environmental Management's approval of a dairy's application to build and operate a new confined feeding operation in Rush County, Indiana. Todd and Brianna defended the dairy against a challenge to the permit approval from a nearby neighbor.
Read MoreLast year the standard for review for administrative decisions was upended (Indiana and federal level). Recently our Court of Appeals explained that this change does not apply to zoning appeals.
Todd Janzen and Brianna Schroeder will both be presenting for the Indiana Farm Bureau Webinar on Agricultural Contracting.
The team from Janzen Schroeder Ag Law will attend Indy Bar’s luncheon hosting U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown.
Janzen Schroeder Agricultural Law LLC / 8425 Keystone Crossing Ste. 111, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 / 317.855.9920 / Disclaimer / Terms / Privacy Policy
There are many companies offering farmers cash to sign soil carbon contracts. What is in these contracts and should you sign up your farm?